BUR #241 has been rejected.
create alias clothed_paizuri -> paizuri_under_clothes
They are basically the same thing, we already have Paizuri Over Clothes for paizuri with clothes on.
Posted under Tags
BUR #241 has been rejected.
create alias clothed_paizuri -> paizuri_under_clothes
They are basically the same thing, we already have Paizuri Over Clothes for paizuri with clothes on.
I don't see the point of deprecating something that you want to keep an implication for. Wouldn't you want to get rid of the tag altogether if it's "basically the same thing" without any implications or deprecations, just moving the posts over with alias -> unalias?
People cannot add the clothed_paizuri tag after deprecation so the implication has no purpose.
Is there a reason to the deprecation over nuke? Is there tags that need to be gardened in clothed_paizuri?
It'd make more sense to imply clothed sex to both paizuri under clothes & paizuri over clothes.
Lyren said:
I don't see the point of deprecating something that you want to keep an implication for. Wouldn't you want to get rid of the tag altogether if it's "basically the same thing" without any implications or deprecations, just moving the posts over with alias -> unalias?
People cannot add the clothed_paizuri tag after deprecation so the implication has no purpose.
Is there a reason to the deprecation over nuke? Is there tags that need to be gardened in clothed_paizuri?It'd make more sense to imply clothed sex to both paizuri under clothes & paizuri over clothes.
me new to this me sorry
BUR #242 has been rejected.
create alias clothed_paizuri -> paizuri_under_clothes
correcting imply to alias
Lyren said:
I don't see the point of deprecating something that you want to keep an implication for. Wouldn't you want to get rid of the tag altogether if it's "basically the same thing" without any implications or deprecations, just moving the posts over with alias -> unalias?
People cannot add the clothed_paizuri tag after deprecation so the implication has no purpose.
Is there a reason to the deprecation over nuke? Is there tags that need to be gardened in clothed_paizuri?It'd make more sense to imply clothed sex to both paizuri under clothes & paizuri over clothes.
From your perspective, we could either have the tag removed altogether or keep it for the sake of generalisation if the user is too lazy to bother specifying the type of clothed_paizuri. Now that I'm thinking about It...this makes sense. If some users are as lazy as I make it out to be, it may not be best practice to touch the tag at all, and to leave it as is.
BUR #245 has been approved by @Lyren.
create alias clothed_paizuri -> paizuri_under_clothes
remove alias clothed_paizuri -> paizuri_under_clothes
deprecate clothed_paizuri
I would rather move the posts & deprecate than keep it as alias, as paizuri over clothes can also be clothed paizuri/clothed sex so it can create possible mistags. So here's an alternative BUR to that.
The bulk update request #241 (forum #1680) has been rejected by @Lyren.
The bulk update request #242 (forum #1684) has been rejected by @Lyren.
The bulk update request #245 (forum #1698) has been approved by @Lyren.