AIBooru

making clothed_paizuri imply paizuri_under_clothes

Posted under Tags

user 899

I agree. There's no reason to have that tag when there are two separate specific tags that the user can choose based on what the image depicts. Generalisation sometimes works, but in this instance, it's best if they are left separate.

Reply
Lyren

I don't see the point of deprecating something that you want to keep an implication for. Wouldn't you want to get rid of the tag altogether if it's "basically the same thing" without any implications or deprecations, just moving the posts over with alias -> unalias?

People cannot add the clothed_paizuri tag after deprecation so the implication has no purpose.
Is there a reason to the deprecation over nuke? Is there tags that need to be gardened in clothed_paizuri?

It'd make more sense to imply clothed sex to both paizuri under clothes & paizuri over clothes.

Reply
Blob

Lyren said:

I don't see the point of deprecating something that you want to keep an implication for. Wouldn't you want to get rid of the tag altogether if it's "basically the same thing" without any implications or deprecations, just moving the posts over with alias -> unalias?

People cannot add the clothed_paizuri tag after deprecation so the implication has no purpose.
Is there a reason to the deprecation over nuke? Is there tags that need to be gardened in clothed_paizuri?

It'd make more sense to imply clothed sex to both paizuri under clothes & paizuri over clothes.

me new to this me sorry

Reply
user 899

Lyren said:

I don't see the point of deprecating something that you want to keep an implication for. Wouldn't you want to get rid of the tag altogether if it's "basically the same thing" without any implications or deprecations, just moving the posts over with alias -> unalias?

People cannot add the clothed_paizuri tag after deprecation so the implication has no purpose.
Is there a reason to the deprecation over nuke? Is there tags that need to be gardened in clothed_paizuri?

It'd make more sense to imply clothed sex to both paizuri under clothes & paizuri over clothes.

From your perspective, we could either have the tag removed altogether or keep it for the sake of generalisation if the user is too lazy to bother specifying the type of clothed_paizuri. Now that I'm thinking about It...this makes sense. If some users are as lazy as I make it out to be, it may not be best practice to touch the tag at all, and to leave it as is.

Reply
1