AIBooru

the_pose implications

Posted under Tags

Lopi999

fish said:

BUR #461 has been rejected.

create implication the_pose -> feet_up

Missing implications that the wiki page describes.

I agree with this.

fish said:

BUR #462 has been rejected.

create alias the_pose -> the_pose_(meme)

Tag name is terrible for most users not deep into the feet fetish circle.
Please suggest other names as well.
See topic #12780, topic #19693

I don't agree with this. "the pose" in of itself is descriptive enough, it's not really memetic either. It's just a name for the position itself, and if it was memetic then it would be an insane looking pose of some kind, but the pose in of itself looks very ordinary and honestly it's pretty common IRL as well. Perhaps it could use a little more of a specific name but I've never seen it called anything else.

Reply
Lyren

There's also foot up and some images tagged with the pose have only one foot up. Is this a mistag? Does having only one foot up make it not taggable for the_pose? This makes the implication a bit tricky without knowing this fact. For now, I see that on stomach always happens, but whether it's foot up or feet up is not always clear.

Reply
Lopi999

Lyren said:

There's also foot up and some images tagged with the pose have only one foot up. Is this a mistag? Does having only one foot up make it not taggable for the_pose? This makes the implication a bit tricky without knowing this fact. For now, I see that on stomach always happens, but whether it's foot up or feet up is not always clear.

You know now that you said this, I retract my yes vote for the initial implication. In fact if you look on Dan, there are many images tagged with the pose that only have a foot up instead of feet up. It's something that depends and the pose does require for at least one foot to be raised up, but it's enough that it shouldn't be implicated because it's possible for only one foot to be up and to still be considered the pose.

Reply
1