Posted under General
Imagine_Breaker said:
I don't remember maybe 6 months more or less, some days ago i have a post with that issue, pixiv have problems too the best way to dodge that is using the manually update and copy the link personally i do that
Example post #46583 and x link using fetch source data actually I notice i created this artist based on twitter link x link generate other artist name
...
That's weird. I dunno what the different names thing is about.
SONYA said:
...
That's weird. I dunno what the different names thing is about.
Yeah i f*** there i create a alias but I'm looking that now but the method to update using a x links work the fetch mark the image like other artist probably i will need hept to fix my mistake here
Updated
Imagine_Breaker said:
Yeah i f*** there i create a alias but I'm looking that now but the method to update using a x links work the fetch mark the image like other artist probably i will need hept to fix my mistake here
And i found the twitter.com and X.com artist not generate other name but for the site aren't the same artist i found this when i was trying to solve my mistakes
Anyone have any idea what might be wrong with this upload?
post #47636
Or this one?
post #47641
Or this one?
post #47695
Or really any of the ones that have been pending for 2 days?
Joleo9 said:
Anyone have any idea what might be wrong with this upload?
post #47636
Or this one?
post #47641
Or this one?
post #47695
Or really any of the ones that have been pending for 2 days?
post #47636 - Small resolution, faux watermark, bad hand, and then the most glaring problem, the legs. I cannot even describe how they are wrong as they are a complete mess, just take a second look yourself.
post #47641 - I don't really see any big issue, simply not my taste.
post #47695 - Not my taste either, but the eyes are also broken-looking and the thing the character is holding is confusing. It kind of looks like a broken, extremely long fingernail.
Also, please refrain from posting pending posts in this topic, as they still have a chance of getting approved.
Lyren said:
post #47636 - Small resolution, faux watermark, bad hand, and then the most glaring problem, the legs. I cannot even describe how they are wrong as they are a complete mess, just take a second look yourself.
post #47641 - I don't really see any big issue, simply not my taste.
post #47695 - Not my taste either, but the eyes are also broken-looking and the thing the character is holding is confusing. It kind of looks like a broken, extremely long fingernail.
Also, please refrain from posting pending posts in this topic, as they still have a chance of getting approved.
Okay. Also, I never noticed the third leg, oops.
what is wrong with post #47141 ? it did so well...
ydel said:
what is wrong with post #47141 ? it did so well...
The limbs don't feel like they connect properly - her right leg and right arm. For the minor issues, there's skin-colored hair next to her right shoulder and a little bit broken ear(s).
Hi, I'm looking for feedback on my recent set of rejected uploads so I might post something worthy, specifically
post #48527
post #48525
post #48524
Totally see how this could get rejected for the hand, what could I do to fix it? Having trouble visualizing how it should really look here. Also, what's most messed up about it? Furthest finger to the left is funky, but also the hand orientation with regard to the non-existent thumb is off. In short, just need more specific feedback so I can fix it and do better :)
SilkToad said:
Hi, I'm looking for feedback on my recent set of rejected uploads so I might post something worthy, specifically
post #48527
post #48525
post #48524
1st post: Her right hand has a few errors, most notable the weird pinky finger. Her hair is merging with the collarbone and the glasses are wonky.
2nd post: One eye has a lot of eyelashes, the other one has none. Her right elbow is confusing, but the biggest issue of the image is the guy's left foot.
3rd post: I don't see anything that would prevent the image being unapproved quality wise (only error I see is the weird detached hair piece under her collarbone) I just don't like the derpy expression. Other approvers might feel the same or have some other personal preferences why it wasn't approved.
komorebi said:
Totally see how this could get rejected for the hand, what could I do to fix it? Having trouble visualizing how it should really look here. Also, what's most messed up about it? Furthest finger to the left is funky, but also the hand orientation with regard to the non-existent thumb is off. In short, just need more specific feedback so I can fix it and do better :)
The furthest one to the right looks like an index finger rather than a thumb, so the assumption is that there is a thumb on the other side of the hand, making the finger count 6. Inpainting or manual editing one of the fingers out would probably fix the hand, for more feedback you can join the AIBooru Discord linked on the footer. Looking closer, one part of the thighhigh is detached from the leg which would confirm there is a thumb that is performing a thighhighs pull.
The furthest one to the right looks like an index finger rather than a thumb, so the assumption is that there is a thumb on the other side of the hand, making the finger count 6. Inpainting or manual editing one of the fingers out would probably fix the hand, for more feedback you can join the AIBooru Discord linked on the footer. Looking closer, one part of the thighhigh is detached from the leg which would confirm there is a thumb that is performing a thighhighs pull.
Okay, that totally makes sense now. The difference is huge. Thoughts on this? If it's good, any way I could replace the image on my original upload with it?: https://files.catbox.moe/2xvu0r.jpg
komorebi said:
Okay, that totally makes sense now. The difference is huge. Thoughts on this? If it's good, any way I could replace the image on my original upload with it?: https://files.catbox.moe/2xvu0r.jpg
Looks good now. Moderators & Admins can replace the image, but as the image is different from the sourced image (Pixiv in this case) it is preferred to re-upload the image as a different post, tag it as revision and add it as a parent to this previous post.
Lyren said:
Looks good now. Moderators & Admins can replace the image, but as the image is different from the sourced image (Pixiv in this case) it is preferred to re-upload the image as a different post, tag it as revision and add it as a parent to this previous post.
Gotcha. I'll probably just re-upload to Pixiv rn as a revision and then re-post here under parent. Thanks for the help!
Please tell me what is wrong with the post ID: 50176, why is it not approved?
Darcetos said:
Please tell me what is wrong with the post ID: 50176, why is it not approved?
The only thing that bothers me is that the pupils feel weird/off-putting, but it is enough for me to dislike the image. They have very asymmetrical irises.
Wondering about post #50277, I'm assuming it's due to some issues with her hair in the back and issues with her earring(s)?
Lopi999 said:
Wondering about post #50277, I'm assuming it's due to some issues with her hair in the back and issues with her earring(s)?
It's the overall chaos & smudginess around that area yes. The earrings, the vision & detached collar have no clear shape or form, just a mush of lines together. The hair is also suffering from the same thing on her bangs, hair flaps, & sidelocks especially. Extra lines above her left eye as well, and as a more minor thing the eyebrows are completely different length.
Hello. I don't know why my arts are deleted.
My followers and users of my LoRAs like my arts.
Is aibooru too good for it?
Enigmata said:
Hello. I don't know why my arts are deleted.
My followers and users of my LoRAs like my arts.
Is aibooru too good for it?
post #51205 - Very bad hands (Inconsistent fingernails, and the fingers don't really connect to the palm. Head also feels quite small compared to the body.
post #51206 - Thumb merging with the suitcase, jpeg artifacts.
post #51207 - bad left hand, and 6 fingers on at least right hand, not sure about the left one due to fingers coming out straight out of the palm and all. Also heavy jpeg artifacts.
post #51208 - Personally I don't like it, no flaws that I can spot though.
post #51209 - Not for my taste either, but on top of that there is jpeg artifacts and a missing hand. Her neck has some weird line and grey tint to it, and inconsistent shadowing below that.
Could I please have general feedback on all of the images that were not approved due to not being approved within 3 days so I can avoid such instances in the future?
Blob said:
Could I please have general feedback on all of the images that were not approved due to not being approved within 3 days so I can avoid such instances in the future?
The furry images are most likely disapproved by all moderators who saw it that time by general taste. In such cases it's recommended to appeal after a month to few months in case there are other moderators active at that time.
post #51792 - The left thumb is very thin, and the ring finger is splitting in two after the joint.
post #51789 - Hand again. The image you posted in the other thread is approvable.
post #51767 - Thumb splitting in half (right hand), extra finger-like skin deform running across the leg (left hand)
post #51766 - 4 fingers each hand, although it is consistent as it is both hands, but the thickness of each hands' fingers are vastly different. Right hand's pinky finger is also disjointed badly (and very long compared to the other fingers).
hi guys, in response to requesting an appeal about my image, I would like if a broader judgment could be given about the image that I uploaded to the site, which has been classified as loli realistic, but I consider that this is not the case , it should be noted that the code I have the AI, and the image shows that it is a computer image and that it is a design that is not realistic but well defined in pixels only. If more moderators could comment on the matter, to know their judgment on the image, since I consider that the image is really more of the Petite type than the Loli reaistic type.
There are also examples of images of girls with small bodies on the platform, and I would like the image to be reevaluated and seen with the petite tag, as is the case with these images of Antlers and Kenji Ai:
DarkL0lik0n69 said:
hi guys, in response to requesting an appeal about my image, I would like if a broader judgment could be given about the image that I uploaded to the site, which has been classified as loli realistic, but I consider that this is not the case , it should be noted that the code I have the AI, and the image shows that it is a computer image and that it is a design that is not realistic but well defined in pixels only. If more moderators could comment on the matter, to know their judgment on the image, since I consider that the image is really more of the Petite type than the Loli reaistic type.
There are also examples of images of girls with small bodies on the platform, and I would like the image to be reevaluated and seen with the petite tag, as is the case with these images of Antlers and Kenji Ai:
It is clear they are made by an AI, otherwise your posts would have been tagged off-topic.
Realistic & photorealistic are tags to describe the style of the image, not that they are photographs. There is also a reason why there are two of these tags: realistic is very clearly still not a photograph, but has elements to realism such as smaller eyes than anime & more realistic lighting than the typical flat anime lighting (such as anime coloring). It is enough for a post to be in realistic style and not photorealistic to be labeled as realistic loli.
---
As for the loli/petite issue, as you said you want others' opinion on it than mine, so not going to say any more about it, but note that as loli wiki says,
of girls who appear to be preadolescent (roughly between the age of 3 to 12)
images you have posted are more in this range and post #34875 & post #38849 which yes, look underage, but not as young as the loli definition.
Hello I'm here to request a appeal on post #54255 which was deleted due to being unapproved for 3 days. Thanks.
jurassicparklionkingfan said:
Hello I'm here to request a appeal on post #54255 which was deleted due to being unapproved for 3 days. Thanks.
You don't need to request to make an appeal, just appeal the post and it'll run through the queue again.
ANJU said:
You don't need to request to make an appeal, just appeal the post and it'll run through the queue again.
oh, I see. That's my bad. The boorus I've been on have both an appeal option on the post and a appeal thread on the forums to give users more options.
jurassicparklionkingfan said:
oh, I see. That's my bad. The boorus I've been on have both an appeal option on the post and a appeal thread on the forums to give users more options.
Not a problem. I kinda figured that's what it was considering you're from ATF and they do that.
Anyway, this thread is generally to receive feedback on why an upload wasn't approved. Making an appeal here is an entirely separate thing.
ANJU said:
Not a problem. I kinda figured that's what it was considering you're from ATF and they do that.
Anyway, this thread is generally to receive feedback on why an upload wasn't approved. Making an appeal here is an entirely separate thing.
Understandable. Noted for the future.
Hi,
No action recently on my uploads. Those will get deleted very soon.
Any specific feedback?
https://aibooru.online/posts?tags=user%3Aeisenbricher+status%3Apending
Specific posts
post #54970
post #54969
post #54967
post #54873
post #54871
post #54870
post #54970
post #54969
- bad hands
post #54873
- Her breast has a mouth-looking thing. It does look like a burn-mark/scar, so I wouldn't see it as an error, but some approvers might press disapprove because of that.
post #54871
- Her foot has a big rock stuck in it.
post #54870
- Both extra finger & bad feet
And as pointed out before, please do not use this thread before the images are actually deleted as they still have a chance to get approved. A lot of the approvers only check the bottom of the queue, not the other way around.
Lyren said:
post #54970
post #54969
- bad handspost #54873
- Her breast has a mouth-looking thing. It does look like a burn-mark/scar, so I wouldn't see it as an error, but some approvers might press disapprove because of that.post #54871
- Her foot has a big rock stuck in it.post #54870
- Both extra finger & bad feetAnd as pointed out before, please do not use this thread before the images are actually deleted as they still have a chance to get approved. A lot of the approvers only check the bottom of the queue, not the other way around.
My bad, didn't notice your earlier message
Any feedback on post #56482? I had similar posts to this one that were approved, just looking to see how I can improve my later gens.
GENTLEPOKEGIRLFUCKER said:
Any feedback on post #56482? I had similar posts to this one that were approved, just looking to see how I can improve my later gens.
Approved, some of the approvers haven't been as active lately so it just slipped through the cracks. On an unrelated note, remember to tag self-upload when applicable.
Lyren said:
Approved, some of the approvers haven't been as active lately so it just slipped through the cracks. On an unrelated note, remember to tag self-upload when applicable.
Thanks, will do!
Hi. Why my post#56924 getting rejected although i have put some detail? Is there any biased decision over.image selection over there?
Or my image doesn't enough explicit to approve that?
nzvemnvz said:
Hi. Why my post#56924 getting rejected although i have put some detail? Is there any biased decision over.image selection over there?
Or my image doesn't enough explicit to approve that?
check this media asset: https://aibooru.online/media_assets/230920
Updated
I have a question for you all. If i generate i really nice picture but it have some minor errors or bad renders like fused fingers or a gistorted ear, is the mindset "this promt with this model will result in this image" better? Or should i just polish it in photoshop and inpaint? but it will not be genuine to the metadata and not easily replicated ? in another words should i value publishing good promts or good art more?
noppersnop said:
I have a question for you all. If i generate i really nice picture but it have some minor errors or bad renders like fused fingers or a gistorted ear, is the mindset "this promt with this model will result in this image" better? Or should i just polish it in photoshop and inpaint? but it will not be genuine to the metadata and not easily replicated ? in another words should i value publishing good promts or good art more?
Since the art is the focus, image quality should be the priority.
I think the best solution is posting only the revised version, but leaving the originals as unposted media assets that you can link to in the comments of the posts you upload. That way you can keep the originals with accurate metadata and not risk having deleted uploads because of errors like that.
noppersnop said:
I have a question for you all. If i generate i really nice picture but it have some minor errors or bad renders like fused fingers or a gistorted ear, is the mindset "this promt with this model will result in this image" better? Or should i just polish it in photoshop and inpaint? but it will not be genuine to the metadata and not easily replicated ? in another words should i value publishing good promts or good art more?
I don't think there's an official stance on this but both approaches are valid. That said, approvers tend to be harsh on small mistakes so I think it makes more sense to make the prompt carry you 80% of the way and then fix the rest manually if you can. At least that's what I do most of the time.
AIBooru is in part a place to share the metadata but replicating images became almost impossible already with the number of variables we're working with. Main focus is just posting great images that were mostly made by AI. Describing the process as closely as possible is great but it should not be prioritized over producing sexy booba.
antlers_anon said:
I don't think there's an official stance on this but both approaches are valid. That said, approvers tend to be harsh on small mistakes so I think it makes more sense to make the prompt carry you 80% of the way and then fix the rest manually if you can. At least that's what I do most of the time.
AIBooru is in part a place to share the metadata but replicating images became almost impossible already with the number of variables we're working with. Main focus is just posting great images that were mostly made by AI. Describing the process as closely as possible is great but it should not be prioritized over producing sexy booba.
I second this notion, AIBooru to me is a place to share what I have created using AI. The purpose of tagging for me is a matter of organisation, including metadata for me is to simply show the steps I took in order to achieve what I got. It's not meant to perfectly replicate an image for me, and to be fairly honest, I don't very often see an image and want to recreate it 1:1. I usually only want to know how to achieve the same aesthetic of said image.
I know it was deleted a few days ago, but what appears to be the issue with post #57514? I notice some issues in the background, but I'm wondering if there's any issues with her body that were notable, to me, I do notice that her upper torso awkwardly bends up, but is there any other notable issues as to why it wasn't approved?
Lopi999 said:
I know it was deleted a few days ago, but what appears to be the issue with post #57514? I notice some issues in the background, but I'm wondering if there's any issues with her body that were notable, to me, I do notice that her upper torso awkwardly bends up, but is there any other notable issues as to why it wasn't approved?
The animal ear fluffs are a bit odd but that's pretty much the only thing I notice, approved.
Looking for constructive feedback on post #58210
eisenbricher said:
Looking for constructive feedback on post #58210
Everything looks great except for the right hand. Mostly the thumb and middle finger are off. At least that's the reason I'm not approving. Index finger on the left hand seems to be doubled too, but it might just be the thumb behind it so I'm not complaining about it too much.
antlers_anon said:
Everything looks great except for the right hand. Mostly the thumb and middle finger are off. At least that's the reason I'm not approving. Index finger on the left hand seems to be doubled too, but it might just be the thumb behind it so I'm not complaining about it too much.
Alright
hi everyone, some moderator could try to see and accept my post? <3
Lasagna_AI said:
hi everyone, some moderator could try to see and accept my post? <3
Please don't ask for approvals. This thread is to get feedback on uploads.
If there's a specific post (or posts) you want reviewed then please link by writing post #1234 where "1234" is the number of your post.
Keeping the thread alive.
Any chance on getting feedback on:
The first three I'm assuming look too young and realistic? I have no idea about the latter ones.
antlers_anon said:
Any chance on getting feedback on:
post #60319 - Real reason is most likely the fact that only 1 approver had seen it. But for real errors that are a bit distracting all can be found from the background: The candelabra is hovering in the air. The table is extending so far out that is standing on top of the bed. There is a random hole on the wall above the window at the top right of the image.
post #60186 - Again, only one seen, that aside the cropping feels odd to me. Also the floor below the counter is a lot higher than the legs are, which can be explained that it is just a raise in the floor but it still feels unsettling "why is that there".
post #60178 - If you look at the elbow, it kinda looks like merging arms, other than that seems perfectly fine so it should be an easy fix.
post #59030 - Black-haired girl's stare is kinda derpy, and red hair's thumb looks like it's going through the sleeve (which could be by design but other sleeve does not do that) but also looks like a wrinkled sausage. The thigh next to the "sausage" also looks like it has a small deform.
post #57491 - Looks fine, verified.
post #54468 - Taste issue from my end, I don't see any major errors.
Can I got a check on post #60354 and post #49490
For the second one, I'm guessing watermark, but what about the first?
Hello.
What's wrong with post #60807?
Sirius_fw said:
Hello.
What's wrong with post #60807?
Approved. Remember that newest revision should be the parent, not the other way around.
@Joeyboi
in the first one the leg seems a bit too long compared to the torso but I don't think it's a bad image so I undeleted it.
The second one just doesn't look appealing to me, and I don't like how the face is cut off. Just my personal opinion, sorry I can't offer anything more constructive.
Lyren said:
Approved. Remember that newest revision should be the parent, not the other way around.
Okay. Thank you!
I'll try to remember about the revisions.
hello , i would like some the feedback on why post #58544 is deleted. Sure, the right hand is slightly distorted but i see plenty of pics approved with similar level of bad hands or worse.
Admittedly, I disagree pretty strongly with the note about the hands being weird. The hands look fine, the thumbs aren't 'missing' they're holding up the shirt from beneath the cloth. That said, I went ahead and made a new version that changed the position of the hands. Not sure how to actually go about revising the image but here's the link to the revised version.
noppersnop said:
hello , i would like some the feedback on why post #58544 is deleted. Sure, the right hand is slightly distorted but i see plenty of pics approved with similar level of bad hands or worse.
In my opinion her hip looks out of place, in addition to other small details like her ear merging with her hair, i think her hand isn't the main reason for not approving it.
Hi. I want to know why post #61936 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal.
GamaZ said:
Hi. I want to know why post #61936 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal.
I think it's her left eye looks weird but all in the post is good for me, the cloth in her hand isn't a real reason to not approve it at least for me.
I also want to know why post #61189 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal. Has it problem with fingers or vulva?
GamaZ said:
I also want to know why post #61189 was deleted. Has it problem with fingers or vulva?
GamaZ said:
Someone left a mod comment that you can see on top:
questionable but only because she has no genitalia
Personally I don't like the image due to bad pupils, kinda odd teeth and heavy compression.
Could I get feedback on post #63487?
Issues I noticed after posting:
- index finger on right hand
- eyeshadow on right eye
- whatever weirdness is going on in the bottom corner of her left eye
Interested in revising if approvers were mainly put off by technical errors.
SadiraM said:
Could I get feedback on post #63487?
Issues I noticed after posting:
- index finger on right hand
- eyeshadow on right eye
- whatever weirdness is going on in the bottom corner of her left eyeInterested in revising if approvers were mainly put off by technical errors.
In my case her hands looks weird in her left hand her fingers aren't defined and her right hand had a minimal issues, thats my reason, her eyes have minimal issues but isnt a reason to not approve it, at least for me
i just want to ask why my last upload got deleted? i'm not mad about this and you guys have your reasons, but i'm just curious. the girl on this image is not a loli and not even realistic. when that image got generated, i directly tried everything to remove anything too young and that checkpoint "something" can't generate anything realistic. you can compare my other uploads that got generated with this checkpoint together with "realistic".
thanks in advance...
SadiraM said:
Could I get feedback on post #63487?
Issues I noticed after posting:
- index finger on right hand
- eyeshadow on right eye
- whatever weirdness is going on in the bottom corner of her left eyeInterested in revising if approvers were mainly put off by technical errors.
Think you nailed all the big ones. Not really feedback but just something to note that novelai tends to do a lot better if you give it artist tags. The default style is just generic slush of the platonic anime girl but stylization not only gives it flavor but also interestingly will fix some hand and artifacting issues (probably since you're focusing down the embedding space).
GamaZ said:
Hi. I want to know why post #61936 was deleted. Fingers and hands looks normal.
Breast sizes are uneven
Could I please have some feedback on post #66305? I understand if it's simply unwelcomed, not a lot of this here, but pure disinterested doesn't really help me learn or correct issues.
kittycat2012 said:
Could I please have some feedback on post #66305? I understand if it's simply unwelcomed, not a lot of this here, but pure disinterested doesn't really help me learn or correct issues.
The content kind of disinterests me but that's really the main issue I have with the image. I have undeleted it.
ANJU said:
The content kind of disinterests me but that's really the main issue I have with the image. I have undeleted it.
Thank you!
kittycat2012 said:
Thank you!
No problem!
As a small note for the future, "disinterest" is the default disapproval reason. The reasoning behind an approver choosing that reason could range from finding an error that made someone not want to approve to just disliking the content of the image itself, and while I understand that not seeing an approver comment sometimes isn't helpful, if there isn't any it generally means they just didn't care for the image.
Considering the new approvers we have lately, if they spotted an issue I feel like they would've written it... so.. it was just bad luck on your part unfortunately, but that's why this thread and the ability to appeal exists.
Anyway... happy posting!
Any thoughts on why this was not approved?
post #66447
flurry said:
Any thoughts on why this was not approved?
post #66447
It's good art, it's already approved.
Please forgive me for the rudeness of asking such a question.
My post #67073 and few posts has been deleted. is it simply poor quality?
I'm thinking of giving up on future posts and going back to being just a viewer.
Please give me the courage to give up.
I sincerely apologize for defiling the community.
With all due respect.
Seeking feedback on post #63904 and post #66407 please!
rigidchips_nero said:
Please forgive me for the rudeness of asking such a question.
My post #67073 and few posts has been deleted. is it simply poor quality?
I'm thinking of giving up on future posts and going back to being just a viewer.
Please give me the courage to give up.
I sincerely apologize for defiling the community.
With all due respect.
No dont give up! The reason why it didnt get approved is mainly because of the face and a missing finger, I'm not sure if you're generating these locally or not, but if you are, theres a tool called "Inpainting" inside of stable diffusion that is amazing at fixing the quality if faces, as for hands (i have trouble with those as well), inpainting hands can be a gamble, but sometimes you might need to redraw a finger or hand in photoshop and then inpaint it again, i'm terrible at explaining but joining the discord server will help you a lot probably.
Also check out some tutorials on youtube on inpainting, you can search "inpaint stable diffusion hands"
Thank you very much for your kind answer!
I've tried Inpaint many times, but I've always thought it was the best result.
After receiving that advice, I think the level I should have reached was too high for me now.
It was a great experience to know that. Thank you very much.
I wish the community all the best in the future.
rigidchips_nero said:
Thank you very much for your kind answer!
I've tried Inpaint many times, but I've always thought it was the best result.
After receiving that advice, I think the level I should have reached was too high for me now.It was a great experience to know that. Thank you very much.
I wish the community all the best in the future.
As i said! Dont quit, join the server they're super helpful and willing to teach you, theres been several times where they help in voice chat, but if you quit, come back whenever you want
I tried :C
eisenbricher said:
Seeking feedback on post #63904 and post #66407 please!
bump... hello mods!
I need to know the feedback before uploading further content. My aim is to keep a high accept rate. Rejections pose an upload limit penalty.
Updated
eisenbricher said:
bump... hello mods!
I need to know the feedback before uploading further content. My aim is to keep a high accept rate. Rejections pose an upload limit penalty.
I'm no approver but post #63904 is a little messy in the sense that the sofa/couch thing doesnt line up and the way shes sitting is strange, other than that i think post #66407 looks fine.
screenshot: https://b.catgirlsare.sexy/xQdwhPJtFH0x.png
@eisenbricher sorry for the late reply,
I agree with sulph about the naruto one, male looks to be in a weird position, but it's not a big problem, approved it.
In the other one, the ear is broken and the strap between her breasts turns into hair at some point.
Thank you for the replies @sulph and @antlers_anon !
Hi, reason behind disapproval of this?
Any help with this one? post #68724
The almost identical child was approved
@flurry
Both images look somewhat overbaked (maybe cfg too high, maybe loras weighted too high) and there's something weird behind the girl's foot that looks like the left heel but there is no leg leading there. The face looked better on one of them (at least to me) so that's the one I approved.
@eisenbricher
For me the elbow/knee behind naruto's back was just too distracting. I don't think it should be there in the pose they are in.
How about this one? post #68858
Wondering why this post #68818 was not approved. Out of curiosity.
Space-Babes said:
Wondering why this post #68818 was not approved. Out of curiosity.
For me it's just minor things that bother too much: Ears a bit broken, the inconsistent fingernails but especially the moon that is missing a piece. It doesn't look like a gibbous moon either to me, just feels weird. With minor edits it'd be a great pic though, so I recommend editing it out and asking for a replacement in topic #172.
flurry said:
How about this one? post #68858
Faux watermark but more importantly the pussy feels very off-centered compared to the leg positions. Same as above, could be edited and replaced as it is also a good piece.
what's wrong with post #69099 ?
I don't get the "JPEG compression", img looks pretty high quality to me
post #67247
Hey, any idea why this was deleted?
Joleo9 said:
post #67247
Hey, any idea why this was deleted?
It was deleted because the the eyes have lots of artifacts, it looks like she has a third nipple, the resolution is low and maybe the approvers just dont think it looks all that appealing.
sulph said:
It was deleted because the the eyes have lots of artifacts, it looks like she has a third nipple, the resolution is low and maybe the approvers just dont think it looks all that appealing.
I don't see the artifacts; can you help point them out for me please?
Joleo9 said:
I don't see the artifacts; can you help point them out for me please?
https://b.catgirlsare.sexy/mqTiRfE_uWWc.png
Run it through hiresfix and you'll see a difference
sulph said:
https://b.catgirlsare.sexy/mqTiRfE_uWWc.png
Run it through hiresfix and you'll see a difference
That url doesn't go anywhere.
Lyren said:
Faux watermark but more importantly the pussy feels very off-centered compared to the leg positions. Same as above, could be edited and replaced as it is also a good piece.
I will work on fixing, thanks. Will you always reject because of the faux watermark? Looks like I have few I want to post that have that, and I don't have time to re-generate all of them, might just crop to get rid of it if that is the only reason some of these are going to be deleted.
Looking for feedback on why some additional were not approved:
because watermark?
post #69143
post #69137
post #69027
post #69026
Are these rejected because of the hand position when tied up? I felt like all of them the illusion was there that the rope was hiding where they were overlapping, except for the last one, that one I missed:
post #69050
post #69042
post #69028
post #68991
Not sure what might be wrong with this one:
post #69181
Updated
Joleo9 said:
That url doesn't go anywhere.
The url works for me
gomes said:
what's wrong with post #69099 ?
I don't get the "JPEG compression", img looks pretty high quality to me
Why are you posting jpgs anyway, we have a 50mb upload limit, unless your internet is actually dogshit pngs or even webp is the better option.
I really can't figure out what's wrong with this one.
post #69304
@flurry
post #69143 - girl has two navels and the male's position looks impossible
post #69137 - girl has a bad hand
post #69027 - her hand is a bit weird but it's not terrible, approved
post #69026 - her hand is bad
in the next four the arms look broken at the wrists
post #69181 - there's a second tail on the right and her right arm i broken
@Joleo9
post #69304 - the wall behind her bends in a really weird way
Could I get some feedback on post #69411?
I know the foot in the background is a bit off, but I feel like if I tried to fix it, I'd only make it worse. Any other things here that could get this approved?
hello, i not quite sure whats wrong with post #69471
give me some advice maybe on what to avoid in future? cuz it looks fine to me. the only very minor error i could think of is her actual togtags are very slightly disconnected from the necklace.
Hi!
What's wrong?
post #69678
Sirius_fw said:
Hi!
What's wrong?
post #69678
Nothing, from what I can see. I undeleted.
ANJU said:
Nothing, from what I can see. I undeleted.
Thanks!
What's wrong with this one? post #69938
strong_hand said:
What's wrong with this one? post #69938
I think the only issue I see is the x-ray is in a weird position.
Hey there, just wanted some feedback for post #69855
I wasn't sure if it had anything wrong with it, but probably it was not that interesting?
aburritoinabottle said:
Hey there, just wanted some feedback for post #69855
I wasn't sure if it had anything wrong with it, but probably it was not that interesting?
Eh, only two approvers marked a reason, so it may not have gotten enough reviews.
I went ahead and undeleted, because it looks fine.
Any idea what's wrong with this one? I thought for sure nothing was wrong with it.
post #69746
Joleo9 said:
Any idea what's wrong with this one? I thought for sure nothing was wrong with it.
post #69746
I didn't see any stand-out issues, so I undeleted it.
Hi, what's wrong with this one? post #70048 Maybe because the male behind her is not fully visible or maybe the image is not that interesting?
somethingweird said:
Hi, what's wrong with this one? post #70048 Maybe because the male behind her is not fully visible or maybe the image is not that interesting?
Hi actually the image is good had minimal issues like her left hand looks weird and some desk had a bad perspective, but I think it has more positive aspects than negative aspects.
post #70713 took a lot of efforts to correct her limbs, fingers, etc so that it won't get disapproved. But still it did... Any specific reason?
After half a month of uploading to this booru I'm at total loss about the approval process. I do a decent amount of work cleaning up the imprefection via Krita's Acly plugin, but somehow the post like (post #71399) gets deleted.
I wanted this booru to become a gallery for the best works I've produced, and while I've indeed dropped several bad quality ones that got deleted for a reason, only 7 out of 28 approved. Just feels unfair. Meanwhile there are approvers approwing their own mediocre uploads left and right.
Updated
So, what was wrong with these two?
post #71530
post #71540
Joleo9 said:
So, what was wrong with these two?
post #71530
post #71540
Aside from the facts that bestiality is a niche fetish not shared by most approvers? The length of her shin is twice the length of her hip to knee in the second picture.
Miragenerate said:
After half a month of uploading to this booru I'm at total loss about the approval process. I do a decent amount of work cleaning up the imprefection via Krita's Acly plugin, but somehow the post like (post #71399) gets deleted.
I wanted this booru to become a gallery for the best works I've produced, and while I've indeed dropped several bad quality ones that got deleted for a reason, only 7 out of 28 approved. Just feels unfair. Meanwhile there are approvers approwing their own mediocre uploads left and right.
The approval process is entirely based on the aesthetic preferences of approvers and most approvers don't really really care about hyper-proportions. This isn't a call of you to change your own taste, that would be absurd, but you have to keep in mind that the approval process is pretty subjective and is also chronically short staffed so it's very possible that the people who might have liked your picture just didn't look at it.
That said, there doesn't really seem to anything particular wrong with that post so I'll go undelete it.
Anyway if you think an upload is mediocre you can always flag it.
Jemnite said:
Aside from the facts that bestiality is a niche fetish not shared by most approvers? The length of her shin is twice the length of her hip to knee in the second picture.
The approval process is entirely based on the aesthetic preferences of approvers and most approvers don't really really care about hyper-proportions. This isn't a call of you to change your own taste, that would be absurd, but you have to keep in mind that the approval process is pretty subjective and is also chronically short staffed so it's very possible that the people who might have liked your picture just didn't look at it.
That said, there doesn't really seem to anything particular wrong with that post so I'll go undelete it.
Anyway if you think an upload is mediocre you can always flag it.
Guess proportions is something else I need to pay attention to. Is that also what's wrong with these two?
71675
71673
eisenbricher said:
post #70713 took a lot of efforts to correct her limbs, fingers, etc so that it won't get disapproved. But still it did... Any specific reason?
Bump
What's wrong with these?
post #72198
post #72199
post #72200
Joleo9 said:
What's wrong with these?
post #72198
post #72199
post #72200
The fingers are quite mangled.
eisenbricher said:
post #70713 took a lot of efforts to correct her limbs, fingers, etc so that it won't get disapproved. But still it did... Any specific reason?
The compression is very noticeable here, creating jpeg artifacts. I have seen this being very common to images that have CivitAI as the source. As for other reasons, just personal, subjective opinions and I see these as issues:
She feels unnaturally tall compared to the surroundings. The pupils' color is bleeding to the sclera, creating purple sclera which looks odd. There's a hair coming out of her necklace.
What about this one?
post #72193
This is bullsh*t.
Bestiality and loli porn gets approved, but SFW images don't?
Gotcha.
ElReyBlanco said:
This is bullsh*t.
Bestiality and loli porn gets approved, but SFW images don't?
Gotcha.
Eh, coomerbait will almost always be the first to get the attention for better and for worse.
Anyway, if you have an image that ends up not being approved, feel free to appeal it to give it another 3-day round in the queue.
Most times, not every single approver will see the image during it's time there so I can understand the frustration.
I looked at both deleted uploads and decided to undelete them too.
ANJU said:
Eh, coomerbait will almost always be the first to get the attention for better and for worse.
Anyway, if you have an image that ends up not being approved, feel free to appeal it to give it another 3-day round in the queue.
Most times, not every single approver will see the image during it's time there so I can understand the frustration.I looked at both deleted uploads and decided to undelete them too.
Thank you. Didn't know that I can appeal turned down pics.
Regarding post #73922.
Does it fall under partially_visible_vulva, pussy_peek or no_panties?
maimaimai said:
Regarding post #73922.
Does it fall under partially_visible_vulva, pussy_peek or no_panties?
no_panties could be, but the other tags shouldn't be used in this post
@Imagine_Breaker
Thanks for helping! Maybe there is a need for 'Tagging Help' sticked thread...
What a strange situation....
Lorim said:
What a strange situation....
Please don't link posts unless three days has passed without approval (deletion).
If they're still pending approval, then just be patient and wait to see if someone approves.
ANJU said:
Please don't link posts unless three days has passed without approval (deletion).
If they're still pending approval, then just be patient and wait to see if someone approves.
Ok noted, sorry for the trouble ^^
I was just a bit surprised and flustered, that's all.
post #74688
Paid reward.
Why would even a moderator do that? Am I missing something?
paid_reward
Updated
Diffusyaga said:
post #74688
Paid reward.
Why would even a moderator do that? Am I missing something?
paid_reward
I'm just going to go off of a whim and just say mate, nobody wants to look at giant watermarks. If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care. But nobody wants to look at giant black marks that can be relatively undone, there are better ways to promote yourself than doing that. Anju just did that as a reaction to those giant watermarks.
Lopi999 said:
I'm just going to go off of a whim and just say mate, nobody wants to look at giant watermarks. If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care. But nobody wants to look at giant black marks that can be relatively undone, there are better ways to promote yourself than doing that. Anju just did that as a reaction to those giant watermarks.
Sure, you deleted that post with a watermark, who cares. You could be right, you could be wrong, but it's your website, you are to decide what to keep and what to delete.
But it's up to me to decide how I watermark things. After your deletion I could remake it with a lesser watermark or even without it.
Or I could just keep posting SFW stuff only. This is just my first day trying this out, so I'm still in "trial and error" phase.
But why violate your own rules and post the paid reward?
I see that the paid reward post was removed, thank you.
Updated
Heya! I'd love to be a contributor here, so I was curious if anyone had some feedback on these posts of mine? Or insight as to why they weren't approved?
Thanks :)
Hey, what was wrong with these two? I don't get why they weren't approved.
post #74533
post #74559
I appealed it, still no.
post #74273
ElReyBlanco said:
I appealed it, still no.
post #74273
While an appeal is never a guarantee for an approval, I saw that one one approver marked a reason. I'm not sure if this means one approver actually looked at the image or no one else cared to mark a disapproval reason. Either way, I undeleted the post.
Joleo9 said:
Hey, what was wrong with these two? I don't get why they weren't approved.
post #74533
post #74559
Likewise, I undeleted these two. They look fine.
flashycrow said:
Heya! I'd love to be a contributor here, so I was curious if anyone had some feedback on these posts of mine? Or insight as to why they weren't approved?
Thanks :)
I undeleted the first post, but the second one just doesn't interest me. You may feel free to appeal it if you want to give another round in the queue though.
Here's ANJU, coming in clutch, as always. Huge thanks.
ANJU said:
While an appeal is never a guarantee for an approval, I saw that one one approver marked a reason. I'm not sure if this means one approver actually looked at the image or no one else cared to mark a disapproval reason. Either way, I undeleted the post.
Likewise, I undeleted these two. They look fine.
I undeleted the first post, but the second one just doesn't interest me. You may feel free to appeal it if you want to give another round in the queue though.
Here's ANJU, coming in clutch, as always. Huge thanks.
It's just that I'm always ready to fix/change something if given the reason. But I saw no reason given so I was left with more questions than answers.
Was the first one of these deleted because of the hands? I have no idea why the second one might've been deleted though.
post #74666
post #74707
What's wrong with this one?
post #75469
Diffusyaga said:
What's wrong with this one?
post #75469
Nothing from I can see, to be honest. I've undeleted it.
Joleo9 said:
Was the first one of these deleted because of the hands? I have no idea why the second one might've been deleted though.
post #74666
post #74707
I've answered this question for furry posts before, but I will say that furry tends to have a slightly harder time being approved here than other content. It heavily depends on the style the image is in, from what I see, and it depends on if any approver (including those not inclined toward furry art) find it appealing in any way.
post #74666 is a 512 x 768 image, and in my experience seeing a lot of images in that resolution here, they tend to just have worse quality. It can be bad artifacting or the higher likelihood of errors and messy looking details (i.e. the hands and eyes stand out to me as looking kind of bad).
post #74707 is personally not of my interest at all, but I notice a couple issues; the eyes (post is tagged as red sclera, but it looks like one eye is red and the other is normal), and the tail (which looks like it's coming out of a lower spot on her body than it should.)
post #75601
"Messages: "jarring censoring"."
Previously by @Lopi999 "If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care."
I understand that different approvers/mods have different opinions, but I thought that this issue was already resolved.
I hope that you won't force me to approve every censored image in this forum topic so I don't have to leave AIBooru :(
P.S. There are a lot of approved images with censorship so I don't really get it.
Diffusyaga said:
post #75601
"Messages: "jarring censoring"."Previously by @Lopi999 "If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care."
I understand that different approvers/mods have different opinions, but I thought that this issue was already resolved.
I hope that you won't force me to approve every censored image in this forum topic so I don't have to leave AIBooru :(
P.S. There are a lot of approved images with censorship so I don't really get it.
Censoring genitalia is much different from censoring breasts completely. Censored nipples has only 5 posts tagged, and even in those cases it's a small censor compared to pixelating the whole breast area. If you look at censored, censoring is barely done anywhere else than genitalia, unless it is done for comedic purpose (pointless censoring, such as post #46093).
Lyren said:
Censoring genitalia is much different from censoring breasts completely. Censored nipples has only 5 posts tagged, and even in those cases it's a small censor compared to pixelating the whole breast area. If you look at censored, censoring is barely done anywhere else than genitalia, unless it is done for comedic purpose (pointless censoring, such as post #46093).
Ok.
I was pretty sure I'd fixed all this post's issues, so what was wrong with it?
post #75236
Hi, I'm new here. I though the booru concept is interesting and since I frequent lots of other AI image sites (such as civitai, twitter, pinterest, chichipui, pixai, aipictor etc.), I am able to share new style and artist with everyone here. I normally look through top posts of the day and follows the top artists of the sites.
As a gauge, I've posted a few styles from various artist to see the respond, but I am stunned by the amount of deletion.
So far I have understood anatomy and specially fingers as the most important concern but the remaining reason are unknown to me.
Low quality as a reason always confuses me as my shares must always have at least 1,000px on either dimension and I'll always avoid non-hires/upscaled image, is there a different sort of quality criteria?
If there is no reasons stated, it's always just the approvers didn't like it enough, which to me is quite vague, especially when the post already has many likes/favorite.
I've appealed these 2 as I find them exceptional quality, but I would still like to know the reason for deletion:
post #75788
post #75623
I did not appeal for these, but I would like to know the reasons as well, or if they could be appeal-worthy.
post #75570 - I find the style interesting and the extra limbs make sense for a spider girl, her cat friend from the same series got approved immediately even though I posted it later.
post #75578 - NAIIAN is a new but popular twitter ai artist that does lots of detailed and high quality 2.5D girls, they took care of the anatomy and lighting in post processing. I could not find any anatomy issue with this image, the detail of the jacket is amazing and lighting looks great on the character.
post #75581 & post #75582 - This set is a popular angel and devil series from Sylicon Dreams, another popular twitter ai artist with a patreon, they are well known from their full body, wide hips and thighs with simple background images, they will also fix their anatomy. While poor quality was highlighted as a reason, I could not see what is low quality about it.
post #75731 - Dio Lacov has been posting wallpaper worthy Hastune Miku images for a long time on twitter, they are always bright and colorful, although they sometimes have finger issues, I did avoid bad hands when selecting an image from them so I am not sure why it was not good enough to post it.
Also genuinely curious, does this site already have a community with preferred biases such flat anime art style or well known waifu anime characters? As much as I want to share more interesting AI art(such as non-human, 3D objects, scenery), I also do not want my post to be not "not liked enough" for the moderator to approve it.
Thank you in advance to anyone that would help me with my inquires, have a good day.
wanderingwonderer said:
Hi, I'm new here. I though the booru concept is interesting and since I frequent lots of other AI image sites (such as civitai, twitter, pinterest, chichipui, pixai, aipictor etc.), I am able to share new style and artist with everyone here. I normally look through top posts of the day and follows the top artists of the sites.
As a gauge, I've posted a few styles from various artist to see the respond, but I am stunned by the amount of deletion.
So far I have understood anatomy and specially fingers as the most important concern but the remaining reason are unknown to me.
Low quality as a reason always confuses me as my shares must always have at least 1,000px on either dimension and I'll always avoid non-hires/upscaled image, is there a different sort of quality criteria?
If there is no reasons stated, it's always just the approvers didn't like it enough, which to me is quite vague, especially when the post already has many likes/favorite.I've appealed these 2 as I find them exceptional quality, but I would still like to know the reason for deletion:
post #75788
post #75623I did not appeal for these, but I would like to know the reasons as well, or if they could be appeal-worthy.
post #75570 - I find the style interesting and the extra limbs make sense for a spider girl, her cat friend from the same series got approved immediately even though I posted it later.
post #75578 - NAIIAN is a new but popular twitter ai artist that does lots of detailed and high quality 2.5D girls, they took care of the anatomy and lighting in post processing. I could not find any anatomy issue with this image, the detail of the jacket is amazing and lighting looks great on the character.
post #75581 & post #75582 - This set is a popular angel and devil series from Sylicon Dreams, another popular twitter ai artist with a patreon, they are well known from their full body, wide hips and thighs with simple background images, they will also fix their anatomy. While poor quality was highlighted as a reason, I could not see what is low quality about it.
post #75731 - Dio Lacov has been posting wallpaper worthy Hastune Miku images for a long time on twitter, they are always bright and colorful, although they sometimes have finger issues, I did avoid bad hands when selecting an image from them so I am not sure why it was not good enough to post it.Also genuinely curious, does this site already have a community with preferred biases such flat anime art style or well known
waifuanime characters? As much as I want to share more interesting AI art(such as non-human, 3D objects, scenery), I also do not want my post to be not "not liked enough" for the moderator to approve it.Thank you in advance to anyone that would help me with my inquires, have a good day.
Primarily the problem with post #75570 isn't the extra arms, but the lack of consistency with the manipulators. The top two are fine, but the bottom two do not resemble each other at all. The one on the left has 6 digits, the one on the right only two, and the one on the left is splayed out all over the place with inconsistent palm size. The lack of consistency and symmetry makes it look like an accident rather than a deliberate choice. post #75623 is just a bit too much of the same thing. Too many petals, too much backlighting, A lot of it is just the same elements repeated over and over again, rather than a holistically interesting composition. The fact that the 2.5d anime style has been done to death with various SD1.5 models doesn't really help. post #75731 is upscaled to a large size ratio but it feels like a bad upscale. The lines aren't very clean, the picture is oversaturated, the hair is big but there's nothing really interesting to say of it composition-wise, and also it has that same SD1.5 overdone plastic texture feeling.
I think post #75578 is fine. The lighting effect is actually really good and the posing and composition is interesting. Undeleted that one.
TBH a lot of these would have been approved like last year or even earlier this year. But newer SDXL based models have much more expanded capabilities so likewise the standards got pushed up. AI-art is extremely cheap to make and you can pump out a lot of fairly high pictures in just a few minutes minutes once you get a proper workflow going so it's much harder to stand out from the crowd than if we were to be judging non-generated artwork where every high quality piece would probably take at least a hour or few.
@Lolicon97, sorry for getting back to you kind of late. I checked out your deleted uploads after you DM'd me but I was too tired from work to write a forum post so here it is today. Here is the breakdown:
I don't want to make an unnecessarily long post to link every deleted post, especially since most of them have the same issue; questionable or outright bad looking hands/fingers, and occasionally feet. I will link some a couple examples of posts I noted as being "worse."
post #65517: bad hands/feet, mangled fingers/toes, bad anatomy (extra foot).
post #75239: bad hands/feet, missing finger, questionable anatomy.
Generally a post on here can be approved even if it has issues, if the approver can overlook the issue(s), but with your posts the issues are so glaring that I really can't justify approving them. That and the fact that if they were approved, they would likely be flagged quickly.
ANJU said:
@Lolicon97, sorry for getting back to you kind of late. I checked out your deleted uploads after you DM'd me but I was too tired from work to write a forum post so here it is today. Here is the breakdown:
- I went ahead and approved post #55699, post #67193, post #67195, post #73760, post #74387, post #75238, post #75939, and post #76012. I skipped on the rest of them.
I don't want to make an unnecessarily long post to link every deleted post, especially since most of them have the same issue; questionable or outright bad looking hands/fingers, and occasionally feet. I will link some a couple examples of posts I noted as being "worse."
post #65517: bad hands/feet, mangled fingers/toes, bad anatomy (extra foot).
post #75239: bad hands/feet, missing finger, questionable anatomy.Generally a post on here can be approved even if it has issues, if the approver can overlook the issue(s), but with your posts the issues are so glaring that I really can't justify approving them. That and the fact that if they were approved, they would likely be flagged quickly.
Thanks ANJU! I will pay more attention to these kinds of details.
By the way, I would like to point out that by simply asking you to take another look at them, eight of my images have been undeleted. This is yet more proof that the evaluation and approval system simply doesn't work. If you looked at all the images I uploaded and left some deleted while undeleted some others, it means that the latter didn't deserve to be deleted from the beginning.
Every day images are uploaded that have no objective errors, but they are deleted because the approval system is totally arbitrary. Something needs to change.
Lolicon97 said:
Thanks ANJU! I will pay more attention to these kinds of details.
By the way, I would like to point out that by simply asking you to take another look at them, eight of my images have been undeleted. This is yet more proof that the evaluation and approval system simply doesn't work. If you looked at all the images I uploaded and left some deleted while undeleted some others, it means that the latter didn't deserve to be deleted from the beginning.
Every day images are uploaded that have no objective errors, but they are deleted because the approval system is totally arbitrary. Something needs to change.
Agreed, I'm baffled that some of the images linked in this topic weren't approved.
I would also like to get some feedback on post #76023. Is there a bias against photorealistic images?
Proper source has been posted, so I'm wondering if the deletion can be revoked.
I would like some feedback on post #73900.
Narrator-1 said:
I would like some feedback on post #73900.
Some things I noticed quite quickly are Mami's sclera being yellow for some reason and her right hand is missing.
Lyren said:
Some things I noticed quite quickly are Mami's sclera being yellow for some reason and her right hand is missing.
Thank you.
@ANJU Can you check these two pics? I don't understand why they were deleted. post #78809 post #78810
Same for post #78882 and post #78884
Lots of my posts are getting deleted due to 'disinterest' lately. Even having decent scores and being technically accurate. I've followed all the past feedback provided in this thread but first time facing so many disinterest based diaspprovals. Are there any changes in the policies lately? Any helpful feedback?
post #78499
post #77858
post #77770
post #77769
post #77709
post #76326
post #75924
post #75727
post #75726
post #75725
post #75702
post #75693
post #66408
post #67908
eisenbricher said:
Lots of my posts are getting deleted due to 'disinterest' lately. Even having decent scores and being technically accurate. I've followed all the past feedback provided in this thread but first time facing so many disinterest based diaspprovals. Are there any changes in the policies lately? Any helpful feedback?
post #78499
post #77858
post #77770
post #77769
post #77709
post #76326
post #75924
post #75727
post #75726
post #75725
post #75702
post #75693
post #66408
post #67908
Apologies for that, possibly lack of interest, and lack of approvers on at the time to see your images for approval. Have undeleted those I consider acceptable. Thanks for bringing this up!
Blob said:
Apologies for that, possibly lack of interest, and lack of approvers on at the time to see your images for approval. Have undeleted those I consider acceptable. Thanks for bringing this up!
Great and many thanks!! Looking forward to keep uploading my content.
eisenbricher said:
Great and many thanks!! Looking forward to keep uploading my content.
👍
eisenbricher said:
Great and many thanks!! Looking forward to keep uploading my content.
What might also help is if you join the discord server and show us your stuff so we can oogle at it!
It's probably happening to me too. reviewed by 1 approver
At least these are not that bad, in my opinion: post #81536, post #81519, post #81517, post #81523
Others: post #81514, post #81527, post #81534, post #81535
ANJU said:
Nothing from I can see, to be honest. I've undeleted it.
I've answered this question for furry posts before, but I will say that furry tends to have a slightly harder time being approved here than other content. It heavily depends on the style the image is in, from what I see, and it depends on if any approver (including those not inclined toward furry art) find it appealing in any way.
post #74666 is a 512 x 768 image, and in my experience seeing a lot of images in that resolution here, they tend to just have worse quality. It can be bad artifacting or the higher likelihood of errors and messy looking details (i.e. the hands and eyes stand out to me as looking kind of bad).
post #74707 is personally not of my interest at all, but I notice a couple issues; the eyes (post is tagged as red sclera, but it looks like one eye is red and the other is normal), and the tail (which looks like it's coming out of a lower spot on her body than it should.)
Yeah, (post #74666) eyes and hands are a weak point of my catgirl LoRa and (post #74707) it looks like it just did red makeup below the right eye. Thanks for the feedback!
Hey, what's wrong with these?
post #75236
post #76864
post #80923
Why is this not approved? post #82295 and post #82122
What should I have done differently?
rnadom said:
Why is this not approved? post #82295 and post #82122
What should I have done differently?
Pay a bit more attention to the hands. Otherwise they're good pics, imo.
strong_hand said:
Pay a bit more attention to the hands. Otherwise they're good pics, imo.
strong_hand said:
Pay a bit more attention to the hands. Otherwise they're good pics, imo.
Any advice for me?
rnadom said:
Why is this not approved? post #82295 and post #82122
What should I have done differently?
The eyes also look a bit off to me, maybe apply some facedetailer/adetailer to it
Joleo9 said:
Any advice for me?
To be fairly honest, nothing looks technically wrong, but it kinda looks outdated if I am being honest. Approvers here can be biased against those images, especially if there are other images alongside it that look far better. It's a contrasting thing in my opinion. Best advice is to keep up with your contemporary peers, perhaps using Adetailer, using a better model, using some LoRA to help with the composition, improving the overall prompting too.
Joleo9 said:
Any advice for me?
Undeleted one of them. post #80923 - the right hand looks kinda weird. As for the furry one, it's just not my thing, so I have no advice to give.
strong_hand said:
Undeleted one of them. post #80923 - the right hand looks kinda weird. As for the furry one, it's just not my thing, so I have no advice to give.
80923 has no right hand?
Joleo9 said:
80923 has no right hand?
Sry, I should've said forearm. The point is that it weirdly cuts off before it even reaches her hair, so it looks like she has no hand.
strong_hand said:
Sry, I should've said forearm. The point is that it weirdly cuts off before it even reaches her hair, so it looks like she has no hand.
Yeah, I see it now. Thanks.
Any advice on what's wrong with these two posts?
post #83088
post #83105
Joleo9 said:
Any advice on what's wrong with these two posts?
post #83088
post #83105
post #83088 - Arms seem uneven, and the left hand looks like it's merged with the jacket.
post #83105 - Hand and foot merging.
Both are also blurry, which, in the case of the latter, has already been pointed out by one of the approvers.
user_1955 said:
I mean it just seems like people will get frustrated and then leave and you won't develop a community you will just churn through lots of people who will all be new and "not learn the rules" Ill just delete my account and go find a more welcoming community to try to get better/share?
Honestly, this is me right now. It's totally fine if this site wants to be "stuff a select group of people like", but that's not clear from the start. It sucks spending a bunch of time manually entering the correct tags (being able to click on the tags to add them would be a great timesaver btw), and it *really* sucks seeing your posts get upvoted and favourited, only for reviewers to deem it "low quality" or "did not like it enough". I was excited to share my work here and become more active in the community. I spent the time to learn about the tags here, as well the types of content that are and aren't allowed. But if the approval process is essentially a roll of the dice, this is not the site for me.
I would really encourage you to make it more clear what this site is and how it functions, as the current process just feels disrespectful to the artists and contributors to me. As such, I will not be coming back, even just to browse.
Can I ask about post #85549? I'm wondering if it's too uninspired with no particular merit, or if there's a problem I'm not aware of.
And I got 2 deleted uploads, why my upload limit was 14, not 13.
How can i get it back to 15?
Thanks!
HitlerAI said:
Can I ask about post #85549?
Undeleted, I didn't see much of an issue with it. I also added some tags you can learn from.
HitlerAI said:
And I got 2 deleted uploads, why my upload limit was 14, not 13.
How can i get it back to 15?Thanks!
Any advice on what's wrong with these two posts?
post #86762
post #86786
post #89189 - what's wrong? the mismatch between the portrait and the character is planned
post #89141 - maybe the approvers just didn't like it? the background is obviously the same as the parent image
I don't notice any particular artifacts or defective hands/fingers. If the tags are set incorrectly or there are not enough of them, I would like to receive feedback to correct/add. If I understand correctly, at least 10 tags must be specified on the upload page, is this really not enough for _publication_?
post #89143 - artifacts+lowres, as I understand
qx6 said:
post #89189 - what's wrong? the mismatch between the portrait and the character is planned
post #89141 - maybe the approvers just didn't like it? the background is obviously the same as the parent image
I don't notice any particular artifacts or defective hands/fingers. If the tags are set incorrectly or there are not enough of them, I would like to receive feedback to correct/add. If I understand correctly, at least 10 tags must be specified on the upload page, is this really not enough for _publication_?post #89143 - artifacts+lowres, as I understand
Something I immediately notice on all of them is how compressed they are, producing jpeg artifacts.
Tags don't affect whether the image gets approved or not at all.
at least 10 tags must be specified on the upload page
Unrelated to the approval process, but 10 tags is definitely not enough for most cases. Some scenery images might have only 10-20 tags that apply, but most often when characters are involved, the tag count usually varies from 20 to several dozen tags when tagged properly.
Any notes on this one? I posted a couple images back to back but this one seems to have slipped through the cracks.
IFUCKPOKEGIRLSGENTLY said:
Any notes on this one? I posted a couple images back to back but this one seems to have slipped through the cracks.
Her right hand appears to be missing a finger, and the ones on her left look a bit short. Other than that, maybe the guy's head and overall silhouette.
Updated
ElReyBlanco said:
Sooooo, what's up with these ones?
AIllicit said:
Can someone please explain why my post was not approved? post #90552
Undeleted.
strong_hand said:
Undeleted.
Based, thank you.
post #91264
some feedback please.
post #91391
Can you check if this one can be approved?
Hi! So, honestly was just testing waters with this post featuring hakurei reimu in a not-so-family-friendly perilous situation:
post #91637
Which did get deleted eventually, which I had a gut feeling would happen.
Yet I never got to know the reason for why it was deleted or never approved. Was it the image format/composition making it blurry on first glance, or was it purely the content/context of the image that was "too weird" for this site in general?
Thanks in advance.
mipmup said:
Hi! So, honestly was just testing waters with this post featuring hakurei reimu in a not-so-family-friendly perilous situation:
post #91637
Which did get deleted eventually, which I had a gut feeling would happen.Yet I never got to know the reason for why it was deleted or never approved. Was it the image format/composition making it blurry on first glance, or was it purely the content/context of the image that was "too weird" for this site in general?
Thanks in advance.
For me it is just the extra pinky on her left hand. Edit and get it replaced.
