Upload Feedback Thread (post here if your uploads are deleted)

Posted under General

ANJU

aburritoinabottle said:

Hey there, just wanted some feedback for post #69855
I wasn't sure if it had anything wrong with it, but probably it was not that interesting?

Eh, only two approvers marked a reason, so it may not have gotten enough reviews.
I went ahead and undeleted, because it looks fine.

Reply
Imagine Breaker

somethingweird said:

Hi, what's wrong with this one? post #70048 Maybe because the male behind her is not fully visible or maybe the image is not that interesting?

Hi actually the image is good had minimal issues like her left hand looks weird and some desk had a bad perspective, but I think it has more positive aspects than negative aspects.

Reply
Miragenerate

After half a month of uploading to this booru I'm at total loss about the approval process. I do a decent amount of work cleaning up the imprefection via Krita's Acly plugin, but somehow the post like (post #71399) gets deleted.
I wanted this booru to become a gallery for the best works I've produced, and while I've indeed dropped several bad quality ones that got deleted for a reason, only 7 out of 28 approved. Just feels unfair. Meanwhile there are approvers approwing their own mediocre uploads left and right.

Updated by Miragenerate

Reply
2816

Joleo9 said:

So, what was wrong with these two?
post #71530
post #71540

Aside from the facts that bestiality is a niche fetish not shared by most approvers? The length of her shin is twice the length of her hip to knee in the second picture.

Miragenerate said:

After half a month of uploading to this booru I'm at total loss about the approval process. I do a decent amount of work cleaning up the imprefection via Krita's Acly plugin, but somehow the post like (post #71399) gets deleted.
I wanted this booru to become a gallery for the best works I've produced, and while I've indeed dropped several bad quality ones that got deleted for a reason, only 7 out of 28 approved. Just feels unfair. Meanwhile there are approvers approwing their own mediocre uploads left and right.

The approval process is entirely based on the aesthetic preferences of approvers and most approvers don't really really care about hyper-proportions. This isn't a call of you to change your own taste, that would be absurd, but you have to keep in mind that the approval process is pretty subjective and is also chronically short staffed so it's very possible that the people who might have liked your picture just didn't look at it.

That said, there doesn't really seem to anything particular wrong with that post so I'll go undelete it.

Anyway if you think an upload is mediocre you can always flag it.

Reply
Joleo9

Jemnite said:

Aside from the facts that bestiality is a niche fetish not shared by most approvers? The length of her shin is twice the length of her hip to knee in the second picture.

The approval process is entirely based on the aesthetic preferences of approvers and most approvers don't really really care about hyper-proportions. This isn't a call of you to change your own taste, that would be absurd, but you have to keep in mind that the approval process is pretty subjective and is also chronically short staffed so it's very possible that the people who might have liked your picture just didn't look at it.

That said, there doesn't really seem to anything particular wrong with that post so I'll go undelete it.

Anyway if you think an upload is mediocre you can always flag it.

Guess proportions is something else I need to pay attention to. Is that also what's wrong with these two?
71675
71673

Reply
Lyren

eisenbricher said:

post #70713 took a lot of efforts to correct her limbs, fingers, etc so that it won't get disapproved. But still it did... Any specific reason?

The compression is very noticeable here, creating jpeg artifacts. I have seen this being very common to images that have CivitAI as the source. As for other reasons, just personal, subjective opinions and I see these as issues:

She feels unnaturally tall compared to the surroundings. The pupils' color is bleeding to the sclera, creating purple sclera which looks odd. There's a hair coming out of her necklace.

Reply
ANJU

ElReyBlanco said:

This is bullsh*t.
Bestiality and loli porn gets approved, but SFW images don't?
Gotcha.

Eh, coomerbait will almost always be the first to get the attention for better and for worse.

Anyway, if you have an image that ends up not being approved, feel free to appeal it to give it another 3-day round in the queue.
Most times, not every single approver will see the image during it's time there so I can understand the frustration.

I looked at both deleted uploads and decided to undelete them too.

Reply
ElReyBlanco

ANJU said:

Eh, coomerbait will almost always be the first to get the attention for better and for worse.

Anyway, if you have an image that ends up not being approved, feel free to appeal it to give it another 3-day round in the queue.
Most times, not every single approver will see the image during it's time there so I can understand the frustration.

I looked at both deleted uploads and decided to undelete them too.

Thank you. Didn't know that I can appeal turned down pics.

Reply
Lorim

ANJU said:

Please don't link posts unless three days has passed without approval (deletion).
If they're still pending approval, then just be patient and wait to see if someone approves.

Ok noted, sorry for the trouble ^^
I was just a bit surprised and flustered, that's all.

Reply
Lopi999

Diffusyaga said:

post #74688
Paid reward.
Why would even a moderator do that? Am I missing something?
paid_reward

I'm just going to go off of a whim and just say mate, nobody wants to look at giant watermarks. If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care. But nobody wants to look at giant black marks that can be relatively undone, there are better ways to promote yourself than doing that. Anju just did that as a reaction to those giant watermarks.

Reply
Diffusyaga

Lopi999 said:

I'm just going to go off of a whim and just say mate, nobody wants to look at giant watermarks. If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care. But nobody wants to look at giant black marks that can be relatively undone, there are better ways to promote yourself than doing that. Anju just did that as a reaction to those giant watermarks.

Sure, you deleted that post with a watermark, who cares. You could be right, you could be wrong, but it's your website, you are to decide what to keep and what to delete.
But it's up to me to decide how I watermark things. After your deletion I could remake it with a lesser watermark or even without it.
Or I could just keep posting SFW stuff only. This is just my first day trying this out, so I'm still in "trial and error" phase.
But why violate your own rules and post the paid reward?
I see that the paid reward post was removed, thank you.

Updated by Diffusyaga

Reply
ANJU

ElReyBlanco said:

I appealed it, still no.
post #74273

While an appeal is never a guarantee for an approval, I saw that one one approver marked a reason. I'm not sure if this means one approver actually looked at the image or no one else cared to mark a disapproval reason. Either way, I undeleted the post.

Joleo9 said:

Hey, what was wrong with these two? I don't get why they weren't approved.
post #74533
post #74559

Likewise, I undeleted these two. They look fine.

flashycrow said:

Heya! I'd love to be a contributor here, so I was curious if anyone had some feedback on these posts of mine? Or insight as to why they weren't approved?

post #74266
post #74480

Thanks :)

I undeleted the first post, but the second one just doesn't interest me. You may feel free to appeal it if you want to give another round in the queue though.

Reply
ElReyBlanco

ANJU said:

While an appeal is never a guarantee for an approval, I saw that one one approver marked a reason. I'm not sure if this means one approver actually looked at the image or no one else cared to mark a disapproval reason. Either way, I undeleted the post.

Likewise, I undeleted these two. They look fine.

I undeleted the first post, but the second one just doesn't interest me. You may feel free to appeal it if you want to give another round in the queue though.

Here's ANJU, coming in clutch, as always. Huge thanks.
It's just that I'm always ready to fix/change something if given the reason. But I saw no reason given so I was left with more questions than answers.

Reply
ANJU

Diffusyaga said:

What's wrong with this one?
post #75469

Nothing from I can see, to be honest. I've undeleted it.

Joleo9 said:

Was the first one of these deleted because of the hands? I have no idea why the second one might've been deleted though.
post #74666
post #74707

I've answered this question for furry posts before, but I will say that furry tends to have a slightly harder time being approved here than other content. It heavily depends on the style the image is in, from what I see, and it depends on if any approver (including those not inclined toward furry art) find it appealing in any way.

post #74666 is a 512 x 768 image, and in my experience seeing a lot of images in that resolution here, they tend to just have worse quality. It can be bad artifacting or the higher likelihood of errors and messy looking details (i.e. the hands and eyes stand out to me as looking kind of bad).

post #74707 is personally not of my interest at all, but I notice a couple issues; the eyes (post is tagged as red sclera, but it looks like one eye is red and the other is normal), and the tail (which looks like it's coming out of a lower spot on her body than it should.)

Reply
Diffusyaga

post #75601
"Messages: "jarring censoring"."

Previously by @Lopi999 "If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care."

I understand that different approvers/mods have different opinions, but I thought that this issue was already resolved.
I hope that you won't force me to approve every censored image in this forum topic so I don't have to leave AIBooru :(
P.S. There are a lot of approved images with censorship so I don't really get it.

Reply
Lyren

Diffusyaga said:

post #75601
"Messages: "jarring censoring"."

Previously by @Lopi999 "If you want to censor genitalia and just put your signature in a more reasonable position on the image (eg. a corner), nobody would care."

I understand that different approvers/mods have different opinions, but I thought that this issue was already resolved.
I hope that you won't force me to approve every censored image in this forum topic so I don't have to leave AIBooru :(
P.S. There are a lot of approved images with censorship so I don't really get it.

Censoring genitalia is much different from censoring breasts completely. Censored nipples has only 5 posts tagged, and even in those cases it's a small censor compared to pixelating the whole breast area. If you look at censored, censoring is barely done anywhere else than genitalia, unless it is done for comedic purpose (pointless censoring, such as post #46093).

Reply
wanderingwonderer

Hi, I'm new here. I though the booru concept is interesting and since I frequent lots of other AI image sites (such as civitai, twitter, pinterest, chichipui, pixai, aipictor etc.), I am able to share new style and artist with everyone here. I normally look through top posts of the day and follows the top artists of the sites.

As a gauge, I've posted a few styles from various artist to see the respond, but I am stunned by the amount of deletion.
So far I have understood anatomy and specially fingers as the most important concern but the remaining reason are unknown to me.
Low quality as a reason always confuses me as my shares must always have at least 1,000px on either dimension and I'll always avoid non-hires/upscaled image, is there a different sort of quality criteria?
If there is no reasons stated, it's always just the approvers didn't like it enough, which to me is quite vague, especially when the post already has many likes/favorite.

I've appealed these 2 as I find them exceptional quality, but I would still like to know the reason for deletion:
post #75788
post #75623

I did not appeal for these, but I would like to know the reasons as well, or if they could be appeal-worthy.
post #75570 - I find the style interesting and the extra limbs make sense for a spider girl, her cat friend from the same series got approved immediately even though I posted it later.
post #75578 - NAIIAN is a new but popular twitter ai artist that does lots of detailed and high quality 2.5D girls, they took care of the anatomy and lighting in post processing. I could not find any anatomy issue with this image, the detail of the jacket is amazing and lighting looks great on the character.
post #75581 & post #75582 - This set is a popular angel and devil series from Sylicon Dreams, another popular twitter ai artist with a patreon, they are well known from their full body, wide hips and thighs with simple background images, they will also fix their anatomy. While poor quality was highlighted as a reason, I could not see what is low quality about it.
post #75731 - Dio Lacov has been posting wallpaper worthy Hastune Miku images for a long time on twitter, they are always bright and colorful, although they sometimes have finger issues, I did avoid bad hands when selecting an image from them so I am not sure why it was not good enough to post it.

Also genuinely curious, does this site already have a community with preferred biases such flat anime art style or well known waifu anime characters? As much as I want to share more interesting AI art(such as non-human, 3D objects, scenery), I also do not want my post to be not "not liked enough" for the moderator to approve it.

Thank you in advance to anyone that would help me with my inquires, have a good day.

Reply
2816

wanderingwonderer said:

Hi, I'm new here. I though the booru concept is interesting and since I frequent lots of other AI image sites (such as civitai, twitter, pinterest, chichipui, pixai, aipictor etc.), I am able to share new style and artist with everyone here. I normally look through top posts of the day and follows the top artists of the sites.

As a gauge, I've posted a few styles from various artist to see the respond, but I am stunned by the amount of deletion.
So far I have understood anatomy and specially fingers as the most important concern but the remaining reason are unknown to me.
Low quality as a reason always confuses me as my shares must always have at least 1,000px on either dimension and I'll always avoid non-hires/upscaled image, is there a different sort of quality criteria?
If there is no reasons stated, it's always just the approvers didn't like it enough, which to me is quite vague, especially when the post already has many likes/favorite.

I've appealed these 2 as I find them exceptional quality, but I would still like to know the reason for deletion:
post #75788
post #75623

I did not appeal for these, but I would like to know the reasons as well, or if they could be appeal-worthy.
post #75570 - I find the style interesting and the extra limbs make sense for a spider girl, her cat friend from the same series got approved immediately even though I posted it later.
post #75578 - NAIIAN is a new but popular twitter ai artist that does lots of detailed and high quality 2.5D girls, they took care of the anatomy and lighting in post processing. I could not find any anatomy issue with this image, the detail of the jacket is amazing and lighting looks great on the character.
post #75581 & post #75582 - This set is a popular angel and devil series from Sylicon Dreams, another popular twitter ai artist with a patreon, they are well known from their full body, wide hips and thighs with simple background images, they will also fix their anatomy. While poor quality was highlighted as a reason, I could not see what is low quality about it.
post #75731 - Dio Lacov has been posting wallpaper worthy Hastune Miku images for a long time on twitter, they are always bright and colorful, although they sometimes have finger issues, I did avoid bad hands when selecting an image from them so I am not sure why it was not good enough to post it.

Also genuinely curious, does this site already have a community with preferred biases such flat anime art style or well known waifu anime characters? As much as I want to share more interesting AI art(such as non-human, 3D objects, scenery), I also do not want my post to be not "not liked enough" for the moderator to approve it.

Thank you in advance to anyone that would help me with my inquires, have a good day.

Primarily the problem with post #75570 isn't the extra arms, but the lack of consistency with the manipulators. The top two are fine, but the bottom two do not resemble each other at all. The one on the left has 6 digits, the one on the right only two, and the one on the left is splayed out all over the place with inconsistent palm size. The lack of consistency and symmetry makes it look like an accident rather than a deliberate choice. post #75623 is just a bit too much of the same thing. Too many petals, too much backlighting, A lot of it is just the same elements repeated over and over again, rather than a holistically interesting composition. The fact that the 2.5d anime style has been done to death with various SD1.5 models doesn't really help. post #75731 is upscaled to a large size ratio but it feels like a bad upscale. The lines aren't very clean, the picture is oversaturated, the hair is big but there's nothing really interesting to say of it composition-wise, and also it has that same SD1.5 overdone plastic texture feeling.

I think post #75578 is fine. The lighting effect is actually really good and the posing and composition is interesting. Undeleted that one.

TBH a lot of these would have been approved like last year or even earlier this year. But newer SDXL based models have much more expanded capabilities so likewise the standards got pushed up. AI-art is extremely cheap to make and you can pump out a lot of fairly high pictures in just a few minutes minutes once you get a proper workflow going so it's much harder to stand out from the crowd than if we were to be judging non-generated artwork where every high quality piece would probably take at least a hour or few.

Reply
ANJU

@Lolicon97, sorry for getting back to you kind of late. I checked out your deleted uploads after you DM'd me but I was too tired from work to write a forum post so here it is today. Here is the breakdown:

I don't want to make an unnecessarily long post to link every deleted post, especially since most of them have the same issue; questionable or outright bad looking hands/fingers, and occasionally feet. I will link some a couple examples of posts I noted as being "worse."

post #65517: bad hands/feet, mangled fingers/toes, bad anatomy (extra foot).
post #75239: bad hands/feet, missing finger, questionable anatomy.

Generally a post on here can be approved even if it has issues, if the approver can overlook the issue(s), but with your posts the issues are so glaring that I really can't justify approving them. That and the fact that if they were approved, they would likely be flagged quickly.

Reply
user 29968

ANJU said:

@Lolicon97, sorry for getting back to you kind of late. I checked out your deleted uploads after you DM'd me but I was too tired from work to write a forum post so here it is today. Here is the breakdown:

I don't want to make an unnecessarily long post to link every deleted post, especially since most of them have the same issue; questionable or outright bad looking hands/fingers, and occasionally feet. I will link some a couple examples of posts I noted as being "worse."

post #65517: bad hands/feet, mangled fingers/toes, bad anatomy (extra foot).
post #75239: bad hands/feet, missing finger, questionable anatomy.

Generally a post on here can be approved even if it has issues, if the approver can overlook the issue(s), but with your posts the issues are so glaring that I really can't justify approving them. That and the fact that if they were approved, they would likely be flagged quickly.

Thanks ANJU! I will pay more attention to these kinds of details.
By the way, I would like to point out that by simply asking you to take another look at them, eight of my images have been undeleted. This is yet more proof that the evaluation and approval system simply doesn't work. If you looked at all the images I uploaded and left some deleted while undeleted some others, it means that the latter didn't deserve to be deleted from the beginning.
Every day images are uploaded that have no objective errors, but they are deleted because the approval system is totally arbitrary. Something needs to change.

Reply
tyto4tme4l

Lolicon97 said:

Thanks ANJU! I will pay more attention to these kinds of details.
By the way, I would like to point out that by simply asking you to take another look at them, eight of my images have been undeleted. This is yet more proof that the evaluation and approval system simply doesn't work. If you looked at all the images I uploaded and left some deleted while undeleted some others, it means that the latter didn't deserve to be deleted from the beginning.
Every day images are uploaded that have no objective errors, but they are deleted because the approval system is totally arbitrary. Something needs to change.

Agreed, I'm baffled that some of the images linked in this topic weren't approved.
I would also like to get some feedback on post #76023. Is there a bias against photorealistic images?

Reply
eisenbricher

Lots of my posts are getting deleted due to 'disinterest' lately. Even having decent scores and being technically accurate. I've followed all the past feedback provided in this thread but first time facing so many disinterest based diaspprovals. Are there any changes in the policies lately? Any helpful feedback?
post #78499
post #77858
post #77770
post #77769
post #77709
post #76326
post #75924
post #75727
post #75726
post #75725
post #75702
post #75693
post #66408
post #67908

Reply
Blob

eisenbricher said:

Lots of my posts are getting deleted due to 'disinterest' lately. Even having decent scores and being technically accurate. I've followed all the past feedback provided in this thread but first time facing so many disinterest based diaspprovals. Are there any changes in the policies lately? Any helpful feedback?
post #78499
post #77858
post #77770
post #77769
post #77709
post #76326
post #75924
post #75727
post #75726
post #75725
post #75702
post #75693
post #66408
post #67908

Apologies for that, possibly lack of interest, and lack of approvers on at the time to see your images for approval. Have undeleted those I consider acceptable. Thanks for bringing this up!

Reply
eisenbricher

Blob said:

Apologies for that, possibly lack of interest, and lack of approvers on at the time to see your images for approval. Have undeleted those I consider acceptable. Thanks for bringing this up!

Great and many thanks!! Looking forward to keep uploading my content.

Reply
Blob

eisenbricher said:

Great and many thanks!! Looking forward to keep uploading my content.

What might also help is if you join the discord server and show us your stuff so we can oogle at it!

Reply
Joleo9

ANJU said:

Nothing from I can see, to be honest. I've undeleted it.

I've answered this question for furry posts before, but I will say that furry tends to have a slightly harder time being approved here than other content. It heavily depends on the style the image is in, from what I see, and it depends on if any approver (including those not inclined toward furry art) find it appealing in any way.

post #74666 is a 512 x 768 image, and in my experience seeing a lot of images in that resolution here, they tend to just have worse quality. It can be bad artifacting or the higher likelihood of errors and messy looking details (i.e. the hands and eyes stand out to me as looking kind of bad).

post #74707 is personally not of my interest at all, but I notice a couple issues; the eyes (post is tagged as red sclera, but it looks like one eye is red and the other is normal), and the tail (which looks like it's coming out of a lower spot on her body than it should.)

Yeah, (post #74666) eyes and hands are a weak point of my catgirl LoRa and (post #74707) it looks like it just did red makeup below the right eye. Thanks for the feedback!

Reply
Joleo9

strong_hand said:

Pay a bit more attention to the hands. Otherwise they're good pics, imo.

strong_hand said:

Pay a bit more attention to the hands. Otherwise they're good pics, imo.

Any advice for me?

Reply
Blob

Joleo9 said:

Any advice for me?

To be fairly honest, nothing looks technically wrong, but it kinda looks outdated if I am being honest. Approvers here can be biased against those images, especially if there are other images alongside it that look far better. It's a contrasting thing in my opinion. Best advice is to keep up with your contemporary peers, perhaps using Adetailer, using a better model, using some LoRA to help with the composition, improving the overall prompting too.

Reply
bluetomato

user_1955 said:

I mean it just seems like people will get frustrated and then leave and you won't develop a community you will just churn through lots of people who will all be new and "not learn the rules" Ill just delete my account and go find a more welcoming community to try to get better/share?

Honestly, this is me right now. It's totally fine if this site wants to be "stuff a select group of people like", but that's not clear from the start. It sucks spending a bunch of time manually entering the correct tags (being able to click on the tags to add them would be a great timesaver btw), and it *really* sucks seeing your posts get upvoted and favourited, only for reviewers to deem it "low quality" or "did not like it enough". I was excited to share my work here and become more active in the community. I spent the time to learn about the tags here, as well the types of content that are and aren't allowed. But if the approval process is essentially a roll of the dice, this is not the site for me.

I would really encourage you to make it more clear what this site is and how it functions, as the current process just feels disrespectful to the artists and contributors to me. As such, I will not be coming back, even just to browse.

Reply
qx6

post #89189 - what's wrong? the mismatch between the portrait and the character is planned
post #89141 - maybe the approvers just didn't like it? the background is obviously the same as the parent image
I don't notice any particular artifacts or defective hands/fingers. If the tags are set incorrectly or there are not enough of them, I would like to receive feedback to correct/add. If I understand correctly, at least 10 tags must be specified on the upload page, is this really not enough for _publication_?

post #89143 - artifacts+lowres, as I understand

Reply
Lyren

qx6 said:

post #89189 - what's wrong? the mismatch between the portrait and the character is planned
post #89141 - maybe the approvers just didn't like it? the background is obviously the same as the parent image
I don't notice any particular artifacts or defective hands/fingers. If the tags are set incorrectly or there are not enough of them, I would like to receive feedback to correct/add. If I understand correctly, at least 10 tags must be specified on the upload page, is this really not enough for _publication_?

post #89143 - artifacts+lowres, as I understand

Something I immediately notice on all of them is how compressed they are, producing jpeg artifacts.

Tags don't affect whether the image gets approved or not at all.

at least 10 tags must be specified on the upload page

Unrelated to the approval process, but 10 tags is definitely not enough for most cases. Some scenery images might have only 10-20 tags that apply, but most often when characters are involved, the tag count usually varies from 20 to several dozen tags when tagged properly.

Reply
strong hand

IFUCKPOKEGIRLSGENTLY said:

Any notes on this one? I posted a couple images back to back but this one seems to have slipped through the cracks.

post #89513

Her right hand appears to be missing a finger, and the ones on her left look a bit short. Other than that, maybe the guy's head and overall silhouette.

Updated by strong hand

Reply
mipmup

Hi! So, honestly was just testing waters with this post featuring hakurei reimu in a not-so-family-friendly perilous situation:
post #91637
Which did get deleted eventually, which I had a gut feeling would happen.

Yet I never got to know the reason for why it was deleted or never approved. Was it the image format/composition making it blurry on first glance, or was it purely the content/context of the image that was "too weird" for this site in general?
Thanks in advance.

Reply
Archive

mipmup said:

Hi! So, honestly was just testing waters with this post featuring hakurei reimu in a not-so-family-friendly perilous situation:
post #91637
Which did get deleted eventually, which I had a gut feeling would happen.

Yet I never got to know the reason for why it was deleted or never approved. Was it the image format/composition making it blurry on first glance, or was it purely the content/context of the image that was "too weird" for this site in general?
Thanks in advance.

For me it is just the extra pinky on her left hand. Edit and get it replaced.

Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6