AIBooru

Comments

Blacklisted:
[hidden]

All image uploads I do on this account are original image generations (OC Character). It's been a while since I last uploaded anything, so I kinda forgot about the rules and was too lazy to recheck. I'm very sorry. I'll do better in the future. Thank you!

  • 4
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    strong_hand said:

    What do you mean?

    i meant that i was tagging like "1girl, 1boy, fingering" etc. etc. and it rejected all my tags because i formatted like that with commas and spaces instead of "1girl 1boy fingering_from_behind"

    Sorry - new to this. And was frustrated to do it over again right then. Thankyou to whoever ended up tagging for me.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    strong_hand said:

    The problem is that these are large and medium, not medium and small (and even then, the medium ones are stretching it).

    That's not how tags work, I hope you realize that.

    I do understand, I love to tag as much as I can, but I was just thinkking out loud, do not take me too seriously.

  • 1
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    dien_rann said:

    Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.

    This is one of the few images I've come across that is:

    • ai generated - lots of these
    • has precisely two girls - lots of these too
    • girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
    • is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
    • has metadata available

    The problem is that these are large and medium, not medium and small (and even then, the medium ones are stretching it).

    Nur said:

    Well, for a normal human perspective, these would be fairly big, but considering the stuff I like this would be small. c:

    That's not how tags work, I hope you realize that.

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    strong_hand said:

    Please tell me you haven't been tagging breasts like these as small.

    Nope, most of what I've been tagging has been clearly on the other end of the scale, where it's a bit more... blatant? where the dividing lines are; hence why I'm trying to track down reference images.

    This is one of the few images I've come across that is:

    • ai generated - lots of these
    • has precisely two girls - lots of these too
    • girl1 and girl2 have different-sized chesticles - a relatively niche subject, at least as I've found so far.
    • is an image I'd be willing to show my mum - doesn't filter out as many images as I've feared, but the number of such images with smaller chesticles is somewhat startling.
    • has metadata available
  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    sulph said:

    please share prompt! Super cute

    I'm afraid, prompt won't help you much, as this picture was created using controlnet (using my own sketch) and inpaint.

    score_9_up, score_8_up, score_7_up, (artist:sciamano240:1.1), (artist:kittew:0.75), (artist:ilya_kuvshinov:0.8), line art, sketch, year 2023, deep eyes, perfect face, detailed face, aesthetic, sketch style, thick outline, traditional media, white background, best quality, amazing quality, very aesthetic, very pleasing

    Updated

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Sirius_fw said:

    There's something wrong with the anatomy.
    The top half is very offset to the right of the bottom half...

    Hmm, you're right, I thought it was just her pushing her hips out to the side, but now that you mention it, it does look weird.

    Updated

  • 0
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Blackfiretsuna said:

    wow! incredible. Are you using a specific lora to achieve that result with that style?, I truly love the quality it has

    @Blackfiretsuna
    Just the lora 'Toy Camera' at low strength and some of the artist tags used on other images using this model. A long prompt with some quality tags and unique stuff like 'infra-red glow' etc. I suppose.

  • 2
  • Reply
  • [hidden]

    Everything is perfect here. The stockings are simply top-notch, the plump thighs are an excellent size, the hairy pussy looks great, the tummy could be made a little thicker, but it also looks great, and I think the fluff on the armpits is missing. Excellent art thank you!!))

  • 1
  • Reply
  • 1 2 3 4 5